<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SEOibiza - The Ancient Ibicenco Combat Arts &#187; 2008 &#187; November &#187; 03</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seoibiza.com/blog/2008/11/03/no-algo-update-glitch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seoibiza.com/blog</link>
	<description>...full-contact search engine optimization &#38; tactical seo web design..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 13:29:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>No Algo update &#8211; Glitch</title>
		<link>http://www.seoibiza.com/blog/2008/11/03/no-algo-update-glitch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seoibiza.com/blog/2008/11/03/no-algo-update-glitch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 11:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>seoibiza</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[algo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoibiza.com/blog/2008/11/03/no-algo-update-glitch/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />So, Matt Cutts confirmed it was a glitch on webmasterworld, with raw data escaping into the index before it had all the correct quality signals applied. I don&#8217;t consider those rankings indicative of anything coming in the future. Some data went into the index without all of our quality signals incorporated, and it should be [...]<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>So, <a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/google/3777991-5-30.htm" target="_blank">Matt Cutts confirmed it was a glitch on webmasterworld</a>, with raw data escaping into the index before it had all the correct quality signals applied.</p>
<blockquote><p><em><font size="2" color="#000000" face="verdana">I don&#8217;t consider those rankings indicative of anything coming in the future. Some data went into the index without all of our quality signals incorporated, and it should be mostly back to normal and continuing to get back to normal over the course of the day.<!-- /post -->     </font></em></p></blockquote>
<p>Lots of people will be very happy to hear that.</p>
<p>We still have some fairly radical changes in places on clients sites and are not wholly convinced they&#8217;re all going to return, we will see I suppose.</p>
<p><em>Edit new info</em>. as always things aren&#8217;t <em>quite</em> so simple. <img src='http://www.seoibiza.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/018599.html" target="_blank">Google search update blows up, results rolling back now </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/google/3777991-7-30.htm" target="_blank">latest from webmaster world.. </a></p>
<p>there is still talk of updates to come, although Google deny this.<a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/google/3777991-7-30.htm" target="_blank"><br />
</a></p>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>Related Posts:</h3><ul><li><a href="http://www.seoibiza.com/blog/2009/04/02/google-update-pagerank-algo-links-blogrolls/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Google Update April 09 &#8211; Pagerank &#8211; Algo &#8211; Links ?</a></li><li><a href="http://www.seoibiza.com/blog/2009/09/03/google-caffeine-live/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Google Caffeine Live?</a></li><li><a href="http://www.seoibiza.com/blog/2008/11/06/nov-algo-update/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Nov 08 Algo Update or Not? &#8211; Still looks like it here&#8230;</a></li><li><a href="http://www.seoibiza.com/blog/2008/10/27/google-weekend-index/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Google&#8217;s Weekend Antics &#038; Vague Speculations</a></li><li><a href="http://www.seoibiza.com/blog/2008/10/31/google-algo-update-linkbuilding-hit/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Google Algo Update &#8211; Linkbuilding hit?</a></li><li><a href="http://www.seoibiza.com/blog/2008/11/12/google-testing-new-serp-features/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Google Testing New SERP features?</a></li><li><a href="http://www.seoibiza.com/blog/2008/11/21/rankings-are-dead/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Rankings are Dead? Personalization Search Wiki &#038; More</a></li><li><a href="http://www.seoibiza.com/blog/2009/07/17/google-algo-watch/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Google Algo Watch</a></li></ul></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seoibiza.com/blog/2008/11/03/no-algo-update-glitch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.280 seconds -->

