<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Caffeine Kicks Google&#8217;s Link Addiction?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seoibiza.com/blog/2009/08/15/caffeine-google-links-addiction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seoibiza.com/blog/2009/08/15/caffeine-google-links-addiction/</link>
	<description>...full-contact search engine optimization &#38; tactical seo web design..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 21:55:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Google Caffeine Live Now? &#124; SEOibiza Blog HQ</title>
		<link>http://www.seoibiza.com/blog/2009/08/15/caffeine-google-links-addiction/comment-page-1/#comment-16714</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Google Caffeine Live Now? &#124; SEOibiza Blog HQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoibiza.com/blog/?p=2087#comment-16714</guid>
		<description>[...] had a quick look here and made a few more Caffeinated observations [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] had a quick look here and made a few more Caffeinated observations [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Caffeine - Initial Impressions</title>
		<link>http://www.seoibiza.com/blog/2009/08/15/caffeine-google-links-addiction/comment-page-1/#comment-10517</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Caffeine - Initial Impressions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoibiza.com/blog/?p=2087#comment-10517</guid>
		<description>[...] phrases  over the last few days  and make some collated data observations past the main one &#8220;click here&#8221; from the previous post on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] phrases  over the last few days  and make some collated data observations past the main one &#8220;click here&#8221; from the previous post on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seoibiza</title>
		<link>http://www.seoibiza.com/blog/2009/08/15/caffeine-google-links-addiction/comment-page-1/#comment-10424</link>
		<dc:creator>seoibiza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 19:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoibiza.com/blog/?p=2087#comment-10424</guid>
		<description>Hey Paul.

lol, ok well we needed a sensationalist headline to go with the de-throning of the standard proof of link dominance -ie &quot;click here&quot; :)

but to be honest the observations are not soley based on that either, there are several searches we look at quite a lot for experimental reasons and know the link graphs and histories of competing sites intricately, these are all showing losses on the anchor text heavy sites, or sites reliant on syndicated (duplicate, articles etc) content. 

maybe its a side effect of the new infrastructure rather than a core &quot;links&quot; change, but &quot;click here&quot; is a pretty significant one, its kind of like when they brought in the Google-bombing filters for the first time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Paul.</p>
<p>lol, ok well we needed a sensationalist headline to go with the de-throning of the standard proof of link dominance -ie &#8220;click here&#8221; <img src='http://www.seoibiza.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>but to be honest the observations are not soley based on that either, there are several searches we look at quite a lot for experimental reasons and know the link graphs and histories of competing sites intricately, these are all showing losses on the anchor text heavy sites, or sites reliant on syndicated (duplicate, articles etc) content. </p>
<p>maybe its a side effect of the new infrastructure rather than a core &#8220;links&#8221; change, but &#8220;click here&#8221; is a pretty significant one, its kind of like when they brought in the Google-bombing filters for the first time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul B</title>
		<link>http://www.seoibiza.com/blog/2009/08/15/caffeine-google-links-addiction/comment-page-1/#comment-10423</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 19:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoibiza.com/blog/?p=2087#comment-10423</guid>
		<description>Yeah i was reading an article at the reg today (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/08/14/google_caffeine_truth/page2.html&quot;&gt;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/08/14/google_caffeine_truth/page2.html&lt;/a&gt;) were they interview Mr Cutts and hes seems to say:

&quot;The new infrastructure sits &#039;under the hood&#039; of Google&#039;s search engine,&quot; read his blog post, &quot;which means that most users won&#039;t notice a difference in search results.&quot;

I think they are definitely tweaking the algo for links but im always doubtful if they are going to reduce googles dependency on links much. I know links can be manipulated but i know that a lot of the new factors that people have been talking about such as user behaviour and social media citations can be hacked much much easier. 

Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah i was reading an article at the reg today (<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/08/14/google_caffeine_truth/page2.html">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/08/14/google_caffeine_truth/page2.html</a>) were they interview Mr Cutts and hes seems to say:</p>
<p>&#8220;The new infrastructure sits &#8216;under the hood&#8217; of Google&#8217;s search engine,&#8221; read his blog post, &#8220;which means that most users won&#8217;t notice a difference in search results.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think they are definitely tweaking the algo for links but im always doubtful if they are going to reduce googles dependency on links much. I know links can be manipulated but i know that a lot of the new factors that people have been talking about such as user behaviour and social media citations can be hacked much much easier. </p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Cox @ Space Ibiza</title>
		<link>http://www.seoibiza.com/blog/2009/08/15/caffeine-google-links-addiction/comment-page-1/#comment-10410</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Cox @ Space Ibiza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 13:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoibiza.com/blog/?p=2087#comment-10410</guid>
		<description>[...] rare double post from us in the same day, but we&#8217;re excited, and the last post was only something dull like a sneak preview at the next generation of Google search or something, so that&#8217;ll keep[...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rare double post from us in the same day, but we&#8217;re excited, and the last post was only something dull like a sneak preview at the next generation of Google search or something, so that&#8217;ll keep[...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.747 seconds -->
